Sci-Hub Is Blowing Up the Academic Publishing Industry

There has been an explosive new development in how scientific research is read and distributed. It’s name is Sci-Hub.

Founded in 2011 by Alexandra Elbakyan (who was, at the time, a 22 year-old graduate student based in Kazakhstan), the site has seen a major uptick in the last year. In February 2016, 6M+ scientific papers were downloaded from Sci-Hub, including articles from major journals like Nature and Science, to more niche titles across many fields, by hundreds of thousands of researchers all across the globe [1]. Simply by punching in a paper title or a DOI (document object identifier), which is a kind of ID number for scientific papers, researchers can get immediate, free access to 50M+ articles on the site.

sci hub usage globally

Map of Sci-Hub IP requests (grouped by nearest major city)

Pissing Off the Big Guys

This is obviously piracy. And Elsevier, one of the largest academic journal publishers, is furious. In 2015, the company earned $1.1 billion in profits on $2.9 billion in revenue [2] and Sci-hub directly attacks their primary business model: subscription service it sells to academic organizations who pay to get access to its journal articles. Elsevier filed a lawsuit against Sci-Hub in 2015, claiming Sci-hub is causing irreparable injury to the organization and its publishing partners.

But while Elsevier sees Sci-Hub as a major threat, for many scientists and researchers, the site is a gift from the heavens, because they feel unfairly gouged by the pricing of academic publishing. Elsevier is able to boast a lucrative 37% profit margin because of the unusual (and many might call exploitative) business model of academic publishing:

  • Scientists and academics submit their research findings to the most prestigious journal they can hope to land in, without getting any pay.
  • The journal asks leading experts in that field to review papers for quality (this is called peer-review and these experts usually aren’t paid)
  • Finally, the journal turns around and sells access to these articles back to scientists/academics via the organization-wide subscriptions at the academic institution where they work or study

Why Academics Are So Fed Up

cost of knowledge

Bigger institutions spend tens of thousands of dollars a year to subscribe to a broad range of important journals — all the University of California campuses combined spend $8.7M on Elsevier subscriptions annually — but smaller organizations or independent researchers must pick and choose and typically have major gaps. Individual articles might cost around $30, which adds up very quickly when a typical research paper might include citations to 50-200 articles.

For many academics, paying exorbitant costs for information they submitted and reviewed for free is simply too much to pay. And in fact over 16,000 researchers have signed The Cost of Knowledge boycott [3], which means they will not submit to or referee an Elsevier journal, signalling the immense frustration many researchers feel about the issue.

Why This is a Pivotal Moment

The academic journal Science recently published a survey of ten thousand readers, many of whom are presumably scientists or other people interested in this issue [4]. While clearly not objective data, the results show that a majority of survey takers having used Sci-Hub, with a quarter indicating they use it weekly or daily.

primary reason for using sci hub

What’s also interesting is that while the #1 reason for using Sci-Hub is not having access to the papers (50%), convenience was also an important factor. Not only does Sci-Hub grant access to nearly every paper on the planet, many find it easier to use than legitimate methods.

Despite being faced with a lawsuit, and having some of their domains taken down (.org and .io), the site continues to operate under other domains like Sci-Hub.cc, via the Dark Net via Tor, and is even sending PDF’s via the messaging app Telegram.

Elbakyan is obviously very smart and very motivated. To operate a site at this scale in a non-US/EU nation and keep a low enough profile not to get caught for five years and counting requires extreme skill, discretion, and persistence. Her blog makes it clear that she’s not even an activist in the general sense that she’s using Sci-Hub to “push the industry to change”. She literally just wants to make sure Sci-Hub or something like it exists forever.

“On the Internet, we obviously need websites like Sci-Hub where people can access and read research literature. The problem is, such websites oftenly cannot operate without interruptions, because current system does not allow it.

The system has to be changed so that websites like Sci-Hub can work without running into problems. Sci-Hub is a goal, changing the system is one of the methods to achieve it.”

Damn. I don’t know if I’m totally behind that message, but her stance is very clear and she is a force to be reckoned with.

The bottom line is that Sci-Hub is here to stay. The genie is out of the bottle and the more Elsevier and other publishers attack the site and Elbakayan, the more they are going to look like Big Oil, Big Tobacco or RIAA/MPAA — evil corporations just trying to suck every dollar out of the system. And beyond the public relations nightmare this creates, it’s also just a technological battle that is almost impossible to win.

What Happens Now

Look, I’m by-and-large a capitalist. Elsevier and other publishers are within their legal right to run their business the way they have been. And I’m not someone who subscribes to the idea that knowledge inherently should be free. I pay for Spotify, The New York Times (digital edition), Esquire magazine (print edition), Netflix, and Amazon Prime Video, and dozens of books both digital and print every year.

But the key thing is that these entities made it easier to buy those items than to pirate them.

Record industry revenues

Total revenue reported by the Record Industry Association of America

Record companies faced enormous challenges when Napster and other file-sharing systems came along to break up the mountains of cash reaped from CD’s during the 90’s and 2000’s. And the truth is, the revenue never came back in terms of digital downloads or streaming (the industry’s total revenue has fallen 66% since 1999).

But guess what — welcome to Schumpter’s creative destruction [5]. The world changes and you have to evolve or die. For decades, many have railed against the business model of the academic publishers and finally, the disruption has arrived. Yes, pirating papers is illegal. But it will be very very difficult to completely shut down Sci-Hub or one of its mirrors. This is the new reality and academic publishers are going to have to live with it.

The music industry adapted by making concerts and licensing a bigger focus. Newspapers like The Economist and The New York Times have sharpened their coverage and created content people were willing to pay for. HBO launched HBO GO. Netflix has a market cap of $42B.

In 1995, Forbes (back when it was a print magazine), wondered if Elsevier and academic publishing would be one of the first industries to be disrupted by the Internet. “Is the party over?” they asked, “it may be nearing its end. The Internet is closing in.” While their timing was off, their assessment of the underlying economics and individual incentives of the industry have not changed, and the technology has only made sharing easier.

Like for most newspapers, it might be time for academic publishers to face the music, cut back and realize that the era of massive revenues and amazing margins is over, and that leaner times are ahead. And to be perfectly honest, I don’t know what the answer is. But if the publishers willing to innovate and actually serve their customers and find new ways of creating value, there’s still hope. Crying “piracy is wrong” and trying to shut down the pirates however, is fruitless, wasteful effort.

There are going to be tough times ahead for academic publishers thanks to Sci-Hub. And that might actually be a great thing for scientists, researchers, and anyone who cares about the future of knowledge.

Footnotes

[1] “But in increasing numbers, researchers around the world are turning to Sci-Hub, which hosts 50 million papers and counting. Over the 6 months leading up to March, Sci-Hub served up 28 million documents. More than 2.6 million download requests came from Iran, 3.4 million from India, and 4.4 million from China.” via Science
[2] According to the RELX group’s annual report, Elsevier, which is represented by the Scientific, Technical & Medical market segment, earned 760M pounds in profit on 2.07B pounds of revenue. via RELX Group 2015 Annual Report
[3] A portion of the stated purpose of the boycott: “Elsevier, Springer, and a number of other commercial publishers (many of them large companies but less significant for their mathematics publishing, e.g., Wiley) all exploit our volunteer labor to extract very large profits from the academic community. They supply some value in the process, but nothing like enough to justify their prices” via The Cost of Knowledge
[4] “Whereas more than 50% of respondents said a lack of journal access was the primary reason for turning to Sci-Hub, about 17% picked simple convenience as their top motive and 23% reported doing so mainly because they objected to the profits publishers make—suggesting that many respondents in those two categories do have institutional journal access. Indeed, on a separate question, about 37% of those who had obtained a pirated journal article through Sci-Hub or other means said they did have traditional forms of access.” also via Science
[5] Creative destruction is a term coined by Joseph Schumpeter in his work entitled “Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy” (1942) to denote a “process of industrial mutation that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one.” via Investopedia 

Related Posts:


Original URL: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedsapi/BwPx/~3/enl488A5Z34/

Original article

Microlight.js, a code highlighting library

microlight.js is
an open-source micro-library which
improves readability of code snippets
by highlighting, for any
programming language, yet without attaching additional
language-packages or styles:

Unlike other code-highlighting
solutions, microlight.js does not
keep a set of rules for many languages. Instead it uses a
general highliting strategy providing a reasonable
highlight for most of programming languages. As result:

  • library size is extremely compact
  • you don’t need to specify which language is that
  • code can be mixed containing several languages

In fact, microlight.js does not
care neither about which language the code is written in,
nor about if the code structure is correct. It just goes
through the code and highlights.

During the
highliting, microlight.js does not
change the color — it only alters font type and
look. Therefore you don’t need to tune-up the color theme
to make it match to the design of the page — it will
always match. In fact, there is no CSS shipped
with microlight.js at all, only
the library itself, containing everything needed, all in
2.2k!

Compatibility

microlight.js is written in
vanilla-js and is shipped as an UMD-module, so it should
work in any reasonable environment. The library was
successfully tested on recent versions of major browsers:

Setting-up

Download and unpack
the distribution,
or install it using bower / npm:

$ bower install microlight

$ npm install microlight

Load the microlight.js in a
preferable way (that is an UMD-module):

Create an element with code content to be highlighted, and
add the microlight class. Don’t
forget to mask the html-related characters, and apply the
monospace style:

for (var i = 0; i<=10; i++) {
// say hello
echo(“hello”);
}

.microlight {
font-family : monospace;
white-space : pre;
}

The result will look like this:

for (var i = 0; i<=10; i++) {
// say hello
echo("hello");
}

Tune-up the element style according to your kinky taste:

.microlight {
font-family : monospace;
white-space : pre;
background-color : #C4E4E8;
color : #052C36;
}

— looks like this:

for (var i = 0; i<=10; i++) {
// say hello
echo("hello");
}

If you change the content on the fly, or switch the style
of an element with the highlighted code, or add
the microlight class to the new
nodes, invoke the following to re-apply the highlight:

microlight.reset();

Have fun!

microlight.js minified and highlighted by itself

!function(e,t){“function”==typeof define&&define.amd?define([“exports”],t):t(“undefined”!=typeof exports?exports:e.microlight={})}(this,function(e){var t,i=window,n=document,o=”appendChild”,r=”test”,a=”;text-shadow:”,l=”opacity:.”,s=” 0px 0px “,c=”3px 0px 5″,d=”)”,u=n.getElementsByClassName(“microlight”),f=function(e){for(e=0;t=u[e++];)for(var f,p,h,g,m,y=t.textContent,x=0,b=y[0],w=1,v=t.innerHTML=””,k=0,C=/(d*, d*, d*)(, ([.d]*))?/g.exec(i.getComputedStyle(t).color),N=”px rgba(“+C[1]+”,”,E=C[3]||1;p=f,f=7>k&&””==f?1:w;){if(w=b,b=y[++x],g=v.length>1,!w||k>8&&”n”==w||[/S/[r](w),1,1,!/[$w]/[r](w),(“/”==f||”n”==f)&&g,'”‘==f&&g,”‘”==f&&g,y[x-4]+p+f==”–>”,p+f==”*/”][k])for(v&&(t[o](m=n.createElement(“span”)).setAttribute(“style”,[“”,a+s+9+N+.7*E+”),”+s+2+N+.4*E+d,l+6+a+s+7+N+E/4+”),”+s+3+N+E/4+d,l+7+a+c+N+E/5+”),-“+c+N+E/5+d,”font-style:italic;”+l+5+a+c+N+E/4+”),-“+c+N+E/4+d][k?3>k?2:k>6?4:k>3?3:+/^(a(bstract|lias|nd|rguments|rray|s(m|sert)?|uto)|b(ase|egin|ool(ean)?|reak|yte)|c(ase|atch|har|hecked|lass|lone|ompl|onst|ontinue)|de(bugger|cimal|clare|f(ault|er)?|init|l(egate|ete)?)|do|double|e(cho|ls?if|lse(if)?|nd|nsure|num|vent|x(cept|ec|p(licit|ort)|te(nds|nsion|rn)))|f(allthrough|alse|inal(ly)?|ixed|loat|or(each)?|riend|rom|unc(tion)?)|global|goto|guard|i(f|mp(lements|licit|ort)|n(it|clude(_once)?|line|out|stanceof|t(erface|ernal)?)?|s)|l(ambda|et|ock|ong)|m(icrolight|odule|utable)|NaN|n(amespace|ative|ext|ew|il|ot|ull)|o(bject|perator|r|ut|verride)|p(ackage|arams|rivate|rotected|rotocol|ublic)|r(aise|e(adonly|do|f|gister|peat|quire(_once)?|scue|strict|try|turn))|s(byte|ealed|elf|hort|igned|izeof|tatic|tring|truct|ubscript|uper|ynchronized|witch)|t(emplate|hen|his|hrows?|ransient|rue|ry|ype(alias|def|id|name|of))|u(n(checked|def(ined)?|ion|less|signed|til)|se|sing)|v(ar|irtual|oid|olatile)|w(char_t|hen|here|hile|ith)|xor|yield)$/[r](v):0]),m[o](n.createTextNode(v))),h=k&&7>k?k:h,v=””,k=11;![1,/[/{}[(-+*=:;|.,?!&@~]/[r](w),/[])]/[r](w),/[$w]/[r](w),”/”==w&&2>h&&”<"!=f,'"'==w,"'"==w,w+b+y[x+1]+y[x+2]=="<!–",w+b=="/*",w+b=="//","#"==w][–k];);v+=w}};e.reset=f,"complete"==n.readyState?f():i.addEventListener("load",f,0)});

spring of 2016, munich


Original URL: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedsapi/BwPx/~3/ntrpdL1XbzE/

Original article

VetTechTrek is creating an e-learning platform to help veterans build careers in the tech industry

VetTechVisit VetTechTrek is a nonprofit founded last year with the goal of helping military veterans network with the technology industry. Over the last 12 months they have worked toward this goal by hosting multiple “treks” that brought more than 180 veterans and spouses to meet with veterans who work at more than 60 technology startups in New York, Silicon Valley and Washington, DC.… Read More


Original URL: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/bUiiLnZXFgA/

Original article

Programming note for 1999.io

Programming note for 1999.io

davewiner

Slowly but surely we’re rounding out the feature set of 1999.io. Now we maintain a monthly archive page for each blog. 

The important thing is that all the text is there, and it’s being maintained automatically by the CMS. And there was a tweak that gets the full months text pre-loaded when you start the editor. 

Here’s the release note for 1999.io server sysops and users. 


Original URL: http://scripting.com/2016/05/30/1294.html

Original article

Grover Podcast is a smart podcast manager for Windows 10

You’re running Windows 10, enjoy browsing podcasts, but really don’t want to install the bulky iTunes? Grover Podcast is a free, easy-to-use Windows 10 app which covers all the podcast basics — and more — and just might have everything you need. The app opens in a “My Podcasts” area, initially empty, but it doesn’t have to stay that way for long. In a click or two you can be entering feed URLs, or maybe importing an OPML file if you’re already managing podcasts elsewhere. Alternatively, entering a keyword in the iTunes API-integrated Search box should get you plenty of… [Continue Reading]


Original URL: http://feeds.betanews.com/~r/bn/~3/FOze8CD7m1M/

Original article

Law Firm Libraries Cannot Simply Be A Service…It Must Be A Strategic Partner

Greg Lambert speaks to fellow Law Librarians, Knowledge Managers and law firm info pros from a pro-active position as he addresses the increasingly prevalent issue of outsourcing critical librarian staff. Institutional knowledge, excellent communications skills, teaching and training competency, a focus on the delivery of excellent customer service, and the capability to respond rather than react to requirements in an increasingly fast paced and competitive arena are key strengths of in-house staff. This conversation has both strategic and tactical implications which our profession must address expertly, actively and timely.


Original URL: http://www.llrx.com/features/law-firm-libraries-cannot-simply-be-a-service.htm

Original article

WordPress plug-in flaw puts over 1M websites at risk

Owners of WordPress-based websites should update the Jetpack plug-in as soon as possible because of a serious flaw that could expose their users to attacks.

Jetpack is a popular plug-in that offers free website optimization, management and security features. It was developed by Automattic, the company behind WordPress.com and the WordPress open-source project, and has over 1 million active installations.

Researchers from Web security firm Sucuri have found a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that affects all Jetpack releases since 2012, starting with version 2.0.

The issue is located in the Shortcode Embeds Jetpack module which allows users to embed external videos, images, documents, tweets and other resources into their content. It can be easily exploited to inject malicious JavaScript code into comments.

To read this article in full or to leave a comment, please click here


Original URL: http://www.computerworld.com/article/3076741/security/wordpress-plug-in-flaw-puts-over-1m-websites-at-risk.html#tk.rss_all

Original article

Hackers Stole 65 Million Passwords From Tumblr

Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai, reporting for Motherboard: On May 12, Tumblr revealed that it had found out about a 2013 data breach affecting ‘a set of users’ email addresses and passwords, but the company refused to reveal how many users were affected. As it turns out, that number is 68 million, according to an independent analysis of the data. Troy Hunt, a security researcher who maintains the data breach awareness portal Have I Been Pwned, recently obtained a copy of the stolen data set. Hunt told Motherboard that the data contained 65,469,298 unique emails and passwords.


Share on Google+

Read more of this story at Slashdot.


Original URL: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/JhXKNCS6IUg/hackers-stole-65-million-passwords-from-tumblr

Original article

Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: